We re usually very good at creating to-do lists for work.
But what about everything outside of work?

I ve started turning my personal habits into a checklist to build discipline and make these habits non-negotiable over time.

Here s mine:

I came across Deutsche Bank s latest report on AI, and it sparked an interesting thought experiment: how likely is it that we ll see AGI (AI that thinks and learns like a human) within the next five years?

The report highlights a fascinating divergence: the view from money vs. the view from science.

• Money: the probability inferred from trillions poured into data centers, Nvidia chips, and servers. Investors seem to be betting that AGI is inevitable.

• Science: the probability inferred from research papers and AI development models. Experts are far more cautious, suggesting the realistic probability is only 20%.

Different AI models excel at different tasks. This isn't just theory, it's backed by real-world benchmarks:
leads in coding (80.9% on SWE-bench) and long-form writing with careful reasoning
excels at conversational tasks, creative work, and maintains memory across sessions
dominates with 1M-token context windows, making it ideal for analyzing lengthy documents
(Writer's enterprise LLM) offers cost-effective performance for business workflows with specialized variants for healthcare, finance, and creative tasks
Despite these clear differences, most professionals stick to one platform. Why?
: Switching between AI tools means losing context every single time. You waste hours re-explaining project details, preferences, and constraints. Tab-switching becomes friction. Context-switching becomes exhausting.
- ?
This is exactly what we have done with Pluto - Plurality Network's ontology agent that supports switching between 30+ AI agents.
1. Go to our memory studio: https://lnkd.in/dp3EJjZj
2. Create memory buckets for your projects in the Memory Studio
3. Add documents or manually input context
4. Switch between ChatGPT, Claude Opus or Sonnet, Gemini, or Palmyra and others mid conversation. Your context stays intact.

Whenever I browse product launches, I somehow subconsciously judge not only the product itself and its quality, but also the quality that is reflected in the effort the makers put into preparing it.

It may sound insignificant, but in my case, these things also make a significant difference:

• Icon GIF at the launch it enlivens the overall impression and is dynamic

• Quality graphics and video

• First, a properly filled-out comment

• Photos in the makers' profiles (it's less trustworthy for me when there's only the letter "J" or something similar)

• Whether any of my contacts or acquaintances on the platform reacted to the launch