Originality - AI and Plagiarism Checker

ChatGPT AI Content Detector and a Modern Plagiarism Checker

3.0•22 reviews•

1.2K followers

ChatGPT AI Content Detector and a Modern Plagiarism Checker

3.0•22 reviews•

1.2K followers

Visit website

Writing assistants

•

AI Content Detection

Combining AI Detection and Plagiarism Checking to determine the Originality of a piece of content. A modern plagiarism checker built for serious web publishers and the most accurate AI Detector capable of detecting GPT-3 and ChatGPT-generated content.

Originality - AI and Plagiarism Checker Reviews

The community submitted 22 reviews to tell us what they like about Originality - AI and Plagiarism Checker, what Originality - AI and Plagiarism Checker can do better, and more.

3.0

Based on 22 reviews

Review Originality - AI and Plagiarism Checker?

Originality - AI and Plagiarism Checker receives mixed reviews. Users appreciate its ability to detect AI-generated content and its user-friendly interface, with some praising it as an essential tool for content creators. However, many users report issues with false positives, where human-written content is incorrectly flagged as AI-generated. This inconsistency has led to frustration and skepticism about its reliability. A maker review from

Milestone Content Studio

highlights the importance of seamless integration and scalability in AI tools, though it doesn't directly address Originality's performance. Overall, while some find it valuable, others question its accuracy and effectiveness.

+19

Summarized with AI

Pros

AI detection (6)

content authenticity verification (3)

detailed reports (3)

plagiarism detection (3)

user-friendly interface (3)

chrome extension (2)

workflow integration (2)

Cons

inaccurate AI detection (11)

false positives (7)

inaccurate plagiarism detection (4)

Pros

Cons

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

Founder Reviews (5)

View all founder reviews

Other Reviews (17)

View all

•1 review

IMHO this is a scam. The AI feature detects human written texts as artificial, the plagiarism checker is very inaccurate and the readability feature is total nonsense (splits sentences at every period). Also, they offer a website scan (which does not include the plagiarism check), and will charge you loads of credits after you started it by accident without showing giving a cost estimation and without the possibility to stop the scan, which I tried. Also no response from the support. This tool is probably only here to get your money.

What needs improvement

lack of customer support (1)inaccurate AI detection (11)inaccurate plagiarism detection (4)readability analysis (1)

Report

10 views2yr ago

•3 reviews

Originality AI left me very disappointed. I used both their website and Google Chrome extension, and I tried with the 50 credits they give you for signing in. I scanned tree documents: one entirely produced with AI, another completely original. Also, I tried some weird text I created in the moment about my day. All showed a horribly 99% AI generated content and and 1% of non-original human content. In the first text, it was understandable, but the second and the third were all false positives. Recently, I read a blog post from them about false positives and how to read them. They say that Originality AI only demonstrate "probabilities", but also say their tool is the most accurate in the market. Honestly, I prefer to identify manually the AI generated content by checking plagiarism, do fact checking, identifying patterns, and ask writers to create their content in Google Docs. Don't waste time and money there.

What's great

chrome extension (2)

What needs improvement

inaccurate AI detection (11)false positives (7)

Report

10 views3yr ago

•1 review

I have tried a number of plagiarism detection tools. The good ones tend to be quite expensive if you don't use them a lot, so I was attracted to the 'pay for what you use' credits model of Originality. I looked for a trial, but there isn't one. You have to sign up and purchase 1,000 credits in order to try the platform. Going by all the hugely positive comments about this product on PH, I thought I would give it a go anyway. Unfortunately, I was immediately disappointed. I pasted in a blog post which had been written for me by a copywriter I was trialling. After a bit of thinking, Originality told me my text was 100% original. I ran the same text through a plagiarism tool which I trust (but which is expensive) and it showed the same blog post was 58%(!) plagiarised, which I was able to verify - it's riddled with copied text - some text is slightly reworded, but some is directly copied-and-pasted from existing articles. So.... I don't feel this tool will meet my needs in its current state. And I have loads of credits left to use. I have not tested out the AI detection mechanism, which might still be a use for those credits, if it works.

What's great

flexible pricing (1)

What needs improvement

no free trial (1)inaccurate plagiarism detection (4)

Report

8 views3yr ago

•1 review

I wasn't sure how much AI-generated content might be lurking in my website's copy. Originality.AI scanned everything and gave me a clear report. It flagged a couple of product descriptions that seemed a little too generic – turns out, they were indeed written by an AI tool a while back. I replaced them with fresh, human-written descriptions, and I feel much better knowing my site is authentic.

What's great

detailed reports (3)AI detection (6)content authenticity verification (3)

Report

1 view2yr ago

•1 review

I have used the software for the AI checker and it has been the best I have tried to date, it has caught some real problems for us. I would agree with the comments regarding the plagiarism checker, I do not think that is there yet and hence we do not really focus on that element. As packaged for spotting AI content - it is pretty good. Excited to see how the software looks in 6-9 months.

What's great

AI detection (6)

What needs improvement

inaccurate plagiarism detection (4)

Report

1 view3yr ago

•1 review

I subscribed to this premium. I checked around 30 contents written by me. It flagged all written by AI. I have been checking other tools which show correct figures. But Originality AI is always wrong. I think Originality AI is doing business by making human content as AI content so people check again and again to reduce its score. I wasted more than USD 100 on checking content and later found that this is SCAM..... Find a better AI checking tool

What needs improvement

inaccurate AI detection (11)false positives (7)

Report

2 views2yr ago

•3 reviews

The AI detection effect is good, but it is not clear how this tool detects whether a piece of content is AI-generated. I tried to provide content from Google's official website, and sometimes it was detected as AI-written, which is obviously problematic.

What's great

AI detection (6)

What needs improvement

inaccurate AI detection (11)

Report

1 view8mo ago

•1 review

It's unreliable. I scanned one of my essays published in 2020, and it said it was 56% AI written. It was published before AI became accessible, and I used NO AI to create it. What bothers me is this company continues to claim it's false positives are only 1%-2%.

What needs improvement

inaccurate AI detection (11)false positives (7)

Report

2 views1yr ago

•1 review

It detected my own text as AI. And I used this to try on some literature pieces written in early 2010 before the AI era and it detected them as AI written. Extremely unreliable. Too many false positives!

What needs improvement

inaccurate AI detection (11)false positives (7)

Report

2 views3yr ago

•1 review

Made a new account just to say that this tool has LOADS of false positives. Gave me a headache just to try to prove that my 100% human generated content is actually human content.

What needs improvement

inaccurate AI detection (11)false positives (7)

Report

1 view3yr ago