Alternatives in this space span everything from screen-and-flow libraries to web screenshot archives and interactive learning case studies. Some are built for quick, in-tool reference work, while others prioritize motion/behavior over static screens or zoom in on a specific surface area like web apps.
Refero vs Mobbin
Refero is a close “same-job” substitute when you want a curated reference library but with a slightly different product shape and pricing posture. It’s oriented around web + iOS UI inspiration and structured browsing, and it’s one of the few options that clearly supports shorter commitments—Denis confirms you can apply codes with both
monthly and annual plans via the
checkout page with monthly or annual plans. It also signals strong user satisfaction with multiple
five-star ratings from designers who use it as a research companion.
Key strengths that stand out:
- Curated UI library for web and iOS with organized browsing and filtering
- Subscription flexibility (monthly/annual), which can matter for freelancers or intermittent research needs
- A product experience that’s resonating, reflected in consistent 5/5 feedback
Best for
- Designers who want a Mobbin-like reference workflow but prefer monthly billing flexibility
- Teams doing regular web + iOS UI benchmarking who still want curated, real-product examples
appshots vs Mobbin
appshots flips the reference experience from “scan a lot of static screens” to “watch the journey.” It’s built around curated UX screen recordings organized by flows (onboarding, sign-up, checkout), which makes it easier to compare interaction pacing, transitions, and the overall rhythm of an experience—especially when the nuance isn’t obvious in a single screenshot. Early reception is very positive, with users leaving
5-star reviews for Appshots.
What makes it stand out:
- Flow-first browsing via recordings (great for understanding how screens connect)
- Quick competitive comparisons across the same journey type (e.g., onboarding vs onboarding)
- A lightweight, “just show me the real flow” vibe supported by another top rating
Best for
- Product designers and PMs who want to benchmark end-to-end UX journeys, not isolated UI states
- Teams aligning on interaction patterns (e.g., where friction happens in sign-up) without installing dozens of apps
Userflows vs Mobbin
Userflows is the “motion matters” alternative: instead of emphasizing a gigantic static catalog, it’s centered on user-flow recordings and supporting screenshots. That makes it especially useful when the decision isn’t just what a screen looks like, but how the flow behaves—timing, progressive disclosure, micro-interactions, and the order of steps.
Where it tends to shine:
- Video-style flow references for high-fidelity competitive analysis
- Clear organization by product and flow type (onboarding, checkout, etc.)
- A good fit when you’re documenting interaction intent for specs, reviews, or stakeholder walkthroughs
Best for
- Designers who repeatedly need recorded flow evidence for interaction discussions
- PM/design pairs doing pattern research for revenue and conversion flows (paywalls, checkout, upsells)
Webframe vs Mobbin
Webframe narrows the scope to web apps and does it in a straightforward way: a curated screenshot archive with high-quality captures, including pages you’d normally need an account (or paywall access) to see. For teams that build SaaS dashboards, settings, admin panels, and pricing/config screens, that “behind the gate” access is a practical differentiator. It also earns strong sentiment—Kirill’s
5/5 rating reflects the value of having a clean place to browse web app UI.
What stands out:
- Web-focused inspiration (helpful if most of your work is SaaS, not mobile)
- Full-page / scroll captures and quick category-style browsing
- Less overhead than flow-heavy tools when you just need fast UI references
Best for
- SaaS/web product designers who want web UI references fast, especially for authenticated surfaces
- Front-end engineers looking for real-world UI patterns to benchmark layout and information density
Growth.Design Case Studies vs Mobbin
Growth.Design Case Studies is less a “library of screens” and more a guided learning and critique format: interactive case studies presented in a comic-like flow that explains the psychology and product logic behind common patterns. It’s ideal when the question isn’t “what does a good signup screen look like?” but “why does this onboarding sequence convert?” The product has a track record of delighting users, reflected in a cluster of
five-star case-study ratings and additional
top-scoring feedback.
What makes it stand out:
- Behavioral/psychology framing that’s useful for growth, retention, and revenue design
- Highly skimmable, narrative walkthroughs that work well for team learning
- A different angle than pure UI reference, backed by another 5/5 review
Best for
- Designers and PMs who want explanations and mental models, not only UI screenshots
- Teams running growth experiments who need pattern ideas plus the rationale behind them
