Kodezi receives mixed reviews from users. Some praise its ability to boost productivity with features like automated code debugging and code generation, highlighting its usefulness for developers, students, and teachers. However, others criticize its clunky interface, technical issues, and lack of effective customer support. While some users appreciate its ease of use and interface, others find it confusing and not entirely free. Overall, Kodezi shows potential but needs improvements in user experience and support to fully meet its promises.

Summarized with AI

Pros

bug detection (3)

code generation (3)

comprehensive documentation (3)

detailed explanations (3)

automated code debugging (2)

easy to use (2)

interface design (2)

productivity boost (2)

Pros

Cons

Reviews

Most Informative

Founder Reviews (1)

Other Reviews (3)

View all

•1 review

What's great

easy to use (2)productivity boost (2)comprehensive documentation (3)automated code debugging (2)detailed explanations (3)code generation (3)interface design (2)bug detection (3)

9.4/10

As a designer switching to dev (its love-and-hate relationship with dev right now tbh); I've become rather hooked onto Kodezi's a-grade bug-fixing and clean code generation, and its updating of docs without me asking. It feels less like a copilot and more like a janitor for tech debt. If you ship real stuff, it’s worth a try.

vs Alternatives

Replit

Code review and debug stands out heads and shoulders above many that I've tried out.

How accurate are Kodezi’s autonomous bug fixes in practice?

Quite accurate, 9.8/10.

Is the VS Code extension stable and fast?

Super-fast.

How responsive and useful is customer support?

Stellar.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

81 views2mo ago

•1 review

Been using this for a bit now, can't recommend it more to developers, students and teachers alike! It's been able to do exactly what I've asked of it with the code generation, optimize my existing code well, explain coding principles I haven't understood, find bugs I didn't even realize were there (and then even fix them of course) and create comprehensive and useful documentation. Sure, there are some bugs and issues, but for the fact that it's a small team working on it and a pretty new company (and concept too), it's really well made and I've already gotten friends and coworkers to use it too. Well done @ishraqkhan and the rest of the Kodezi team on what you've done so far, can't wait to see were it goes from here!

What's great

comprehensive documentation (3)detailed explanations (3)code generation (3)bug detection (3)

Report

258 views3yr ago

•1 review

Their marketing talks a big game about revolutionizing code, but the actual product is nowhere near what they promise. Half the time, the suggestions were irrelevant or broken. It felt like I was testing a beta version they’re charging full price for.

What needs improvement

paid service (1)

Report

215 views5mo ago