Hyta

Hyta

Forge your AI training legacy

458 followers

Hyta powers the world-class AI training force to advance reliably at scale through always-on pipelines of specialized human intelligence and trusted contribution tracking, so frontier capabilities can compound across industries
Hyta gallery image
Hyta gallery image
Hyta gallery image
Hyta gallery image
Hyta gallery image
Free Options
Launch Team / Built With
Wispr Flow: Dictation That Works Everywhere
Wispr Flow: Dictation That Works Everywhere
Stop typing. Start speaking. 4x faster.
Promoted

What do you think? …

Ray
Maker
📌

Hyta powers the world-class AI training force to advance reliably at scale through always-on pipelines of specialized human intelligence and trusted contribution tracking, so frontier capabilities can compound across industries.

Zeiki Yu

Huge congrats on the launch — love how Hyta is systematizing trusted, high-signal human feedback for AI post-training at scale.

Meenah pro

Awesome launch

Quick question , after today's Product Hunt traffic , how are you planning to build early user reviews and long-term credibility

Philip Sørensen

Interesting framing on post-training as continuous rather than a one-off. We've been using AI heavily in building our product and the "trust reset" problem is real - every time you switch contexts or models, institutional knowledge gets lost. How do you think about the quality-speed tradeoff? The most valuable feedback often comes from domain experts who are also the busiest.

Mykyta Semenov 🇺🇦🇳🇱

Interesting product. We use memory for this. And we have two types of memory: one within the chat and one across the entire account to personalize future chats. By the way, in Europe this isn’t simple — you need to comply with GDPR )

Piroune Balachandran

Persistent contributor profiles across training runs is the part that usually breaks down. Most teams rebuild annotator pools from scratch each project because there's no portable trust layer. If Hyta lets domain experts compound reputation across orgs and model versions, that solves a real coordination problem. Would be interesting to see how you handle disagreements between high-trust raters on ambiguous samples.