Atoms

@gxy5202 

Really appreciate that. We agree the space is early and there’s tons of room to improve. Our focus is reliability and completeness: stronger research before building, clearer trade-offs, and a workflow that gets you beyond “AI-generated output” to something you can actually ship and iterate. If you try it, I’d love to hear where it feels better and where it still falls short.

@gxy5202 Thank you! Totally agree the space is still early and there’s a lot of room to improve. We’re putting most of our energy into making the workflow more reliable end to end, not just generating something that looks good. Really appreciate the encouragement.

@gxy5202 Thank you so much. Really appreciate the thoughtful encouragement, we are definitely trying to push the quality bar beyond “just generate something.”

@gxy5202 Thank you, really appreciate that. We’re definitely focused on pushing beyond “generate code” into a workflow that helps you make better product decisions and ship with more confidence.

@frank_li13 
Love that, thank you. That’s exactly what we mean by “vibe-business”: not just turning creativity into a prototype, but pushing it all the way to something you can actually launch, charge for, and iterate on.

And I agree on the bigger picture too, it changes how new businesses can get funded and started. If the cost of testing an idea drops dramatically, more creators can bootstrap and validate without needing capital upfront.

If you share the kind of creative business ideas you’re thinking about, I’m happy to suggest what a fast “first revenue” version would look like with Atoms.

@frank_li13 Thank you, I really love how you put that.

@frank_li13 Appreciate that. “Vibe business” is our way to describe the gap between having a cool idea and turning it into something that can actually earn revenue. If it helps more creators cross that gap, we are doing our job.

@frank_li13 Appreciate that. The spirit is turning creativity into something sustainable, not just a project, and making the path to revenue feel less mysterious. 

@zeiki_yu Thank you. That end to end loop is exactly what we’re building for: helping solo founders go from idea to something live, measurable, and monetizable, not just a prototype. If you try it, I’d love to hear what kind of business you build first.

@zeiki_yu Thank you so much. Solo founders were exactly who we had in mind when we built the end to end workflow.

@zeiki_yu Thank you. Solo founders are a big focus for us, keeping the loop tight from idea to something live.

@zeiki_yu Thank you, really glad it resonates. Solo founders deserve a workflow that covers the whole loop, not just one step.

@jaceperry  @tripplep 
This made our day, thank you. We’ve put a lot of effort into keeping the exported code maintainable with clear separation of concerns, because we want people to be able to own and extend it.

And yes on “vibe marketing”, we love that direction. Today we already support SEO and distribution planning, and we’re exploring deeper marketing workflows once a product is shipped. If you have a preferred channel (X, LinkedIn, SEO, outbound), I’d love to hear what “vibe marketing” would look like for you.

@jaceperry  @tripplep This made my day, thank you. We care a lot about exported code being maintainable and easy to take over, so I’m really glad the structure felt solid. And yes, vibe marketing is such a good idea, we’re excited about building more “after shipping” workflows. If you have a preferred channel, I’d love to hear what you’d want that feature to do first.

@jaceperry  @tripplep This is awesome to hear, thank you for trying it and for the concrete feedback on code quality. And +1 on vibe marketing, we also think distribution needs to be part of the same loop, so it is definitely on our radar.

@jaceperry  @tripplep This is awesome feedback, thank you. Great to hear the exported code feels clean and modular. If you have one pain point from the build to ship path, auth, payments, deploy, or something else, I’d love to capture it.

@candyrorae 
Absolutely agree, and thank you for putting it so clearly. That “setup cost” is the real tax that kills long-tail ideas.

Atoms is built to compress that cost by running the full loop as a team: research the niche, scope a tight MVP, ship with the boring essentials (auth, payments, deploy), then iterate based on real signals. The goal is exactly what you said: make it economical to test many small niches and double down on the ones that show traction.

If you have a niche in mind, drop it here. Happy to suggest what a “10 in a day” style MVP would look like for it.

@candyrorae Yes, exactly. Setup cost is the killer for tiny niches. If we can make “research → ship → test distribution” cheap and fast, then you can run many small bets and only double down when you see real signal. Thanks for articulating it so well.

@candyrorae This is exactly the bet that excites us too. When the setup cost drops close to zero, tiny niches stop being “not worth it” and start being a real strategy. We are building Atoms around that long tail economics shift.

@candyrorae Totally agree, and thanks for articulating it so well. If setup and coordination costs drop enough, the long tail goes from “not worth it” to “actually viable,” and that’s a big bet we’re building toward.

@mrpop 
Yes. You can use Atoms purely for research and evaluation: market and competitor analysis, positioning, ICP clarity, distribution hypotheses, and MVP scoping, without committing to building or launching. A lot of users start there to decide what’s worth pursuing before spending time and budget. If you share a rough idea, I’m happy to show what the evaluation output looks like.

@mrpop Thank you! We put a lot of effort into keeping it clean, because the underlying workflow can get complex quickly.

@mrpop Thanks, and yes we are thinking in that direction. Once something is shipped, the next unlock is consistent distribution. We want marketing to be part of the same loop, not a separate set of tools, so the product and the growth plan stay aligned. 

@mrpop Yes. You can use it purely for research and evaluation: market map, competitor scan, ICP, pricing hypotheses, and risk assessment, then decide whether to build. A lot of users start there to kill weak ideas early or sharpen a strong one.

@shirleyw 
Yes, it’s on our roadmap. Right now Atoms is optimized for solo builders and small teams, but we’re actively working toward collaboration features like shared workspaces, roles and permissions, project history, and handoffs so multiple people can co-own a project cleanly. If you tell me your team setup, I’d love to learn what collaboration workflow you need most. 

@shirleyw Yes, it’s on our roadmap. Right now Atoms is optimized for solo builders, but we’re actively planning collaboration features like shared workspaces, roles and permissions, project history, and clean handoffs so multiple people can co-own a project.

@shirleyw Yes. Collaboration is on our roadmap. Multi person projects with shared context, roles and permissions, comments, and clear version history are all important for this to work in real teams. If you tell me your typical setup, solo plus occasional collaborator, or a full team, I can share what we are prioritizing first.

@shirleyw Yes, collaboration is on our roadmap. We want teams to share a project workspace with roles, version history, and clear decision logs so handoffs don’t lose context.