This debate often gets framed as Should researchers use AI for literature reviews?
I think the real question is different.
Is it ethical to spend hundreds of researcher hours on mechanical work when that time could be spent advancing actual knowledge?
Think about a researcher spending an entire weekend searching papers, skimming irrelevant abstracts, copying citations, and fixing references. That s not insight or discovery. That s overhead.
I'm building something to solve a problem my family faces every single day, and I'd love your feedback.
The problem:
Every household has someone carrying the invisible mental load of meals. It's not the cooking that's exhausting it's the deciding. 21 meals a week. Remembering who eats what. Knowing what's in the fridge. Figuring out quick meals for busy nights.
you can follow drift's progress and other cool stuff im making on x - https://x.com/divikkk1 Ive Thought about some more features for drift and how they can help creators , happy recording !
Senior developers aren t slow reviewers. They re overloaded reviewers.
PRFlow is an AI agent that reviews and analyzes GitHub pull requests so senior developers don t have to spend time on the obvious layer of review.
What makes it practical is that you can chat with PRFlow about its feedback. Ask why something matters. Understand the reasoning before a human ever steps in.
It s not about replacing reviewers. It s about protecting senior attention Check it out : https://platform.graphbit.ai/mar...
Hey Product Hunt - I m Gabriel, founder of gbMeals
I launched gbMeals in 2025 and have been improving it ever since : tighter personalisation, cleaner PDFs, better shopping lists, and more realistic plans people can actually stick to.
My own life changed when I fixed my diet about 6 years ago, and I built gbMeals to help busy people eat better without the daily what should I make? stress.
I ve also tried to keep the price affordable for everyone - to the point where it might look cheap or average at first glance but trust me, it s far from that.
