Links
Badges



Maker History
- QuashA mobile QA agent that runs tests without scriptsFeb 2026
Forums
Quash is Live! Let's talk Intent-Driven Mobile Testing
Hey Product Hunt community and fellow makers,
We're thrilled to announce that Quash is officially live on Product Hunt today!
For too long, mobile QA has been a bottleneck, plagued by brittle test scripts, endless maintenance, and the constant struggle to keep up with rapidly evolving UIs. We built Quash to change that.
Quash is an intent-driven mobile testing tool that lets you write and run tests in plain language, not code. Imagine testing your mobile app without ever writing a single script, and having your tests intelligently adapt to UI changes with built-in self-healing. That's the power of Quash.
We've poured our hearts into creating a solution that:
Eliminates script maintenance: Write tests in plain English, focus on what to test, not how.
Adapts to UI changes: Our AI-powered self-healing ensures your tests remain robust, even when your UI evolves.
Provides comprehensive insights: Get detailed execution reports with step-level intent, actions, and screenshots, whether you're testing on real devices, cloud devices, or local emulators.
We believe this approach will empower teams to deliver higher quality mobile apps faster and with less friction. We're incredibly excited about the potential of intent-driven testing to revolutionize mobile QA.
We'd love to hear from you!
Hi, I’m building an intent-driven mobile testing tool
Hey folks! I m part of a small team building Quash. We've spent the last year obsessing over a mobile QA agent that runs tests in plain language instead of scripts.
We hit our General Availability (GA) release a few weeks ago and the energy from the devs we met in Bangalore was wild. The conversation kept coming back to one thing: "When does automation actually start slowing us down?"
We re focused on teams testing real apps on real devices (iOS and Android), without spending weeks maintaining brittle selectors. I m here mainly to learn from other devs and QA folks especially around:
What you refuse to automate because it s "too complex."
How you decide test coverage is good enough for a release.
When does the "scripting" overhead become more work than the testing itself?
We re launching on Product Hunt in a couple of days. If this sounds relevant, I'm happy to share a preview link or just trade notes.
Your Android QA, done by an agent : Quash GA is live (free credits)
We ve just opened Quash GA. It s ready for anyone to download and use today.

Quash is mobile-first, scriptless QA. You write test steps in plain English; our Android execution agent performs taps, scrolls, inputs, and checks on real devices. The platform handles orgs, suites, runs, and auditable reports (screenshots, logs, API/DB assertions).
Scripts and recorders are brittle. UI changes break them; maintenance eats time. Quash keeps intent stable while the UI evolves, so coverage goes up and upkeep goes down.
