highlight fast idea-to-prototype workflows and weekly use for internal tools. Users like the clean design, GitHub/Supabase integrations, and smoother front-end flow in 2.0. Critiques focus on reliability at scale: loops when fixing bugs, unexpected overwrites, slow edits, weak SEO, and costly credit burn; backend/auth flows can be tricky. Overall, excellent for demos, landing pages, and early MVPs; less reliable for complex apps today.

+158

Summarized with AI

Pros

fast prototyping (29)

no code (14)

rapid application development (14)

design capabilities (9)

MVP builder (8)

GitHub integration (6)

user-friendly interface (6)

frontend development (4)

Supabase integration (4)

excellent prompt understanding (2)

Cons

buggy (12)

complexity handling issues (12)

expensive (5)

poor customer support (5)

limited prompts (4)

limited backend support (3)

limited error handling (2)

Pros

Cons

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

Founder Reviews (90)

View all founder reviews

Other Reviews (71)

View all

•2 reviews

What's great

I’m into clean, sharp UIs and this tool nails it ... minimal but powerful, exactly the kind of design tools I dream of building when I code late into the night. I love how you kept it sleek without over-engineering, and made something that just feels “right to use.

vs Alternatives

I chose Lovable because it lets me build great web pages fast ... minimal code, maximum speed. It fits how I work: simple, efficient, and value-driven.

How well does Supabase integration handle auth and CRUD?

Works well ... Lovable integrates with Supabase so you get database + auth + basic CRUD out-of-the-box.

Can the visual style editor match your brand guidelines?

Yes ... you can match your branding thanks to Lovable’s component-based editor and visual design controls

Are there limitations for SEO, backend jobs, or integrations?

here are limits — for complex or large apps, customization becomes harder; some advanced integrations, complex backend logic, or scaling might not work well

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

288 views2mo ago

•1 review

It's going in the right code direction :-)

Report

10 views2yr ago

•1 review

Really great app! Pushing it to the limit and seeing where I might be giving too many or complicated instructions but really great so far. I've tested a web page and a weight loss tracker app and cant stop working on therm. Will test out integrating custom code next and get something to work but really saves time using this app.

Report

6 views2yr ago

•1 review

It's a great prototyping tool and the interface is very easy to use.

Report

6 views2yr ago

•1 review

The experience of generating and validating quickly is awesome. It's a great tool and would recomend it to anyone interested in building things.

Report

5 views2yr ago

•1 review

I love it. Great job team gptengineer.app.

Report

3 views2yr ago

•1 review

It made something pretty nice in a very short time from one prompt, so I am really impressed. Making changes is still a challenge for me to find the right prompts and to get the wanted results, but I think after a bit of practice I will get better at that to avoid it getting confused and erroring. We are just getting to know each other, so learn to communicatie is step 1😊

What's great

fast prototyping (29)

What needs improvement

limited prompts (4)

Report

2 views2yr ago

Lovable

Thanks for the review Sabrina! Indeed helps a lot to practice on how to prompt and speak the same language texhnically. We’ll be looking into both making it less sensitive, and resharing good resources from the community on how to prompt best.

Report

2yr ago